Anarchivist Manifesto Response

Where before we looked at archives as a way of preserving the past truthfully for what it is, the Anarchivist Manifesto finds the anarchy beyond that and repurposes the past to form new ideas. This is similar to how other pieces may expose an unseen or unconsidered viewpoint but pushes it further to manufacture an entirely new narrative from the existing context. I find this interesting for it doesn't necessarily mean that the archived pieces are recontextualized to the present but instead used to create an alternate space in the original. This can maintain some the truth but builds its own fiction.

I really feel like this could be used to simulate a kind of Mandela effect. Trying to make a fabrication so believable, perhaps uncannily enough, to trick the viewer into questioning their belief of the past.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Capitalism and Claire Bishop’s “Digital Divide”

Although Claire Bishop’s “Digital Divide” is an interesting interpretation of Contemporary Art’s interaction (or for her argument’s sake: disavowal) of the digitization of the human existence, I do not wholeheartedly agree with it. I agree with her claim that the sudden attraction of “old media” for contemporary artists in the late 1990s coincided with the rise of “new media,” particularly the introduction of the DVD in 1997. But to be honest, this constant “return” to analog ways of doing things as a sort of “nostalgia” has happened constantly with the introduction of new technology. She claims that the art world has not really interacted with the issues that the new digital world has created. However, I believe that this digitized experience is so ubiquitous, so ingrained in us now that the need to explicitly reference this existence in every work would be unnecessary. Instead, what I found most interesting about her argument was her connection of the art world’s resistance to trul...
Read more

1984 + Rewriting the Past

First, in response to Soda Jerk's "The Anarchivist Manifesto," I feel like it's important to dissect the title before I begin analyzing the work in itself. The title is a pun by combining the words "anarchist" and "archivist". An anarchist is an individual who rejects hierarchies deemed unjust and advocates for their replacement with self-managed, self-governed societies based on voluntary, cooperative institutions. In addition, an archivist creates and maintains an archive, essentially controlling the past. The title pun hints at the crux of Soda Jerk's argument which emphasizes not only how much power images have over the past, but also even more so, how much power the individuals wield that derive the accepted narrative from those images. In response to this concentration of power, Soda Jerk advocates for the complete dissolution of this, by trying to stir a "rebellion" of the masses through the active interception, rejection, an...
Read more