Week 2: Reading Response Mark Fisher

 I believe that Mark Fisher is trying to say that the past affects the future like the above comment made in this blogger^. I found it interesting how he tied in digital recall like the VHS or DVD and how you are able to go back in time in that aspect. Not only does the past affect the future but the future affects the past. Another part of the paper I found interesting is TV shows are breaking in time (not going to the future or going to the past anymore) like the show Sapphire and Steel. I also found it interesting that there are themes of loss present in the cancellation of the future. He says "the cancellation of the future has been accompanied by a deflation of expectations". He also continues saying that the internet and mobile technology have altered everyday experience beyond all recognition. This article was a bit challenging for me to understand but hopefully I was along the right track.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Capitalism and Claire Bishop’s “Digital Divide”

Although Claire Bishop’s “Digital Divide” is an interesting interpretation of Contemporary Art’s interaction (or for her argument’s sake: disavowal) of the digitization of the human existence, I do not wholeheartedly agree with it. I agree with her claim that the sudden attraction of “old media” for contemporary artists in the late 1990s coincided with the rise of “new media,” particularly the introduction of the DVD in 1997. But to be honest, this constant “return” to analog ways of doing things as a sort of “nostalgia” has happened constantly with the introduction of new technology. She claims that the art world has not really interacted with the issues that the new digital world has created. However, I believe that this digitized experience is so ubiquitous, so ingrained in us now that the need to explicitly reference this existence in every work would be unnecessary. Instead, what I found most interesting about her argument was her connection of the art world’s resistance to trul...
Read more

1984 + Rewriting the Past

First, in response to Soda Jerk's "The Anarchivist Manifesto," I feel like it's important to dissect the title before I begin analyzing the work in itself. The title is a pun by combining the words "anarchist" and "archivist". An anarchist is an individual who rejects hierarchies deemed unjust and advocates for their replacement with self-managed, self-governed societies based on voluntary, cooperative institutions. In addition, an archivist creates and maintains an archive, essentially controlling the past. The title pun hints at the crux of Soda Jerk's argument which emphasizes not only how much power images have over the past, but also even more so, how much power the individuals wield that derive the accepted narrative from those images. In response to this concentration of power, Soda Jerk advocates for the complete dissolution of this, by trying to stir a "rebellion" of the masses through the active interception, rejection, an...
Read more