I think what Mark Fischer is talking about can directly relate back to part of the article by Claire Bishop. Both address how nostalgia arises in the wake of future. Where Bishop paints the inherent nostalgia created by obsolescence as a hindrance to technology and art, Fischer similarly looks at how even imagining the future can create a different sort of nostalgia for the present; a "what would/could have been" which dulls the future of now. Fischer calls the result of referencing or comparing the future, "the slow cancellation of the future", which I find a bit dramatic. I don't think a disappointment that heavily weighted needs to be associated with not obtaining the outcomes of an imagination. As long as there was something enjoyed or consumed from any facet of what was imagined, there was ultimately a gain.
Comments
Post a Comment