A Response to “The Image-World” by Susan Songtag

The name of this reading was vague. There was no expectation or preparation given to the reader. A better title would be Historical and Cultural Beliefs Regarding Photography.
The most interesting subject within the reading was the notion that tearing up and throwing away a photograph is a “ruthless gesture of rejection.” This idea was presented as coinciding with early beliefs about photography. However, it is my belief that this attitude remains true. Comparing this early belief to the digital age of photography highlights the preciousness of those early photographs. Not everyone had a camera so the photograph was taken to commiserate a person or special occasion; not to mention the monetary value of the photograph. I agree that throwing away or destroying a photograph that holds such intention would be a gesture of rejection for that time, as well as, today. Any printed photograph embodies intention. There is a reason for which every photograph is printed.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Capitalism and Claire Bishop’s “Digital Divide”

Although Claire Bishop’s “Digital Divide” is an interesting interpretation of Contemporary Art’s interaction (or for her argument’s sake: disavowal) of the digitization of the human existence, I do not wholeheartedly agree with it. I agree with her claim that the sudden attraction of “old media” for contemporary artists in the late 1990s coincided with the rise of “new media,” particularly the introduction of the DVD in 1997. But to be honest, this constant “return” to analog ways of doing things as a sort of “nostalgia” has happened constantly with the introduction of new technology. She claims that the art world has not really interacted with the issues that the new digital world has created. However, I believe that this digitized experience is so ubiquitous, so ingrained in us now that the need to explicitly reference this existence in every work would be unnecessary. Instead, what I found most interesting about her argument was her connection of the art world’s resistance to trul...
Read more

1984 + Rewriting the Past

First, in response to Soda Jerk's "The Anarchivist Manifesto," I feel like it's important to dissect the title before I begin analyzing the work in itself. The title is a pun by combining the words "anarchist" and "archivist". An anarchist is an individual who rejects hierarchies deemed unjust and advocates for their replacement with self-managed, self-governed societies based on voluntary, cooperative institutions. In addition, an archivist creates and maintains an archive, essentially controlling the past. The title pun hints at the crux of Soda Jerk's argument which emphasizes not only how much power images have over the past, but also even more so, how much power the individuals wield that derive the accepted narrative from those images. In response to this concentration of power, Soda Jerk advocates for the complete dissolution of this, by trying to stir a "rebellion" of the masses through the active interception, rejection, an...
Read more